The American destroyer "USS Carney", the third destroyer of the United States of America, enters the coast of the Mediterranean Sea to join the two largest American destroyers "Ford" and "Eisenhower" with their forces off Israel since the outbreak of the war on Gaza after the seventh of last October. With the presence of the Russian fleet off Syrian Tartous, here is the Chinese intervention. Naval game: six destroyers heading towards the Middle East, bringing together the “Mediterranean Sea” of the three largest nuclear powers in the world. Will World War III be completed with the arrival of Chinese destroyers?
Let us go back to before the war started. This gathering of
these bearers was not just a picnic or a tea party in which they spoke through
the mouths of the defender of the sun or blue of the Mediterranean or exchanged
conversations about their catches during the journey to reach the
Mediterranean. Rather, let them share the sea, the sky, and the earth, each
according to his strength.
Here, far from their borders, on a land other than their
own, each of them creates his own legend on the corpses and remains of the
peoples of the region. These most advanced and destructive naval ships moved
from multiple directions, and the first American ships came after the second in
the first days, those that had been stationed in their military bases since the
war on Iraq in 2003 and 2011. Then Chinese destroyers began arriving in the
area for various reasons, saying it was normal. This was done periodically, as
it visited the coasts of the Sultanate of Oman for several days, then moved to
visit the coasts of Kuwait and docked in the Arabian Gulf next to the American
bases in Qatar, Bahrain and Iraq.
This comes after an official American report talking about
the need for the United States to prepare for possible simultaneous wars with
Russia and China by expanding its conventional forces, alliances, and its
program to modernize nuclear weapons. The Russian Chinese partnership strongly
highlights the positions of the two countries about the brutal war waged by the
Israeli occupation state against Palestinian civilians in the Gaza Strip. These
positions are in the face of the original enemy, the United States, and the
conflict of the parties over the Middle East region, as it is an extremely
complex space for international alliances and building a unified global front
in the face of the United States. US states. And her daughter Israel.
Although they vetoed the American draft resolution on Gaza
in the Security Council today, Wednesday, October 24, which gives the green
light to Israeli brutality under the pretext of self-defense and describes
Palestinian fighters as terrorists. With this veto, the two countries seek to
confront American arrogance and its unconditional support for the genocide
practiced by Israel, and to drag the region into a war that is accelerating to
include various regions, starting with Gaza, and reaching southern China. sea.
It is true, of course, that Russia and China are not ideal
or neutral in their respect for human rights or international law, but their
dealings with the issue of the war on Gaza are in line with their tendencies to
build parallel axes of global polarization. To the United States of America.
The idea of their insistence on refusing to use the description “terrorism”
against the Palestinian resistance, or Moscow’s keenness to liken the Israeli
bombing of the Gaza Strip to what Russia’s Leningrad witnessed, does not mean
that they are truly concerned with that, and that despite any alignments or
battles, this is in the interest of the resistance and the Palestinian people.
And his battle. His presence.
Is the battle between the two warring poles taking place
only on the arena of international law and international legitimacy, or does
the competition between them go beyond the blue carpet of the sea called the
Mediterranean?
We know very well the American military bases in the Middle
East, and we know the American movements in the region and its influence
through its protégé Israel, starting from its establishment, as Biden said at
the beginning of the war before the Israeli Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC),
the Jewish lobby. And “If there had been no Israel, we would have created
Israel,” leading to the Arab Israeli normalization agreements. But in the war,
we hear and see powerful parties and players, not in defense of the Palestinian
right, but to seize other areas in the region as spoils, as a declared show of
force in the face of the United States of America. It develops into a third
world war.
On the cusp of World War III, everyone is trying to avoid
this escalation, including Washington itself, despite its display of force and
the movement of its naval military fleets towards the occupied coasts of
Israel, and sending marines to deal with urban warfare in Gaza, to free the
hostages, and not to get involved in a land war because it will be a spark for
outside intervention.
A US report published last August, shortly before the war in
Gaza, warned: “Given China’s deliberate decision to treat all civilian assets
as an extension of its powerful military, the consequences of this wartime
control could be catastrophic.”
The American report adds, “If this strategy succeeds, it
could give Beijing the ability to completely strangle the international
economy, not by seizing ports or closing the Suez Canal, for example, but
simply by controlling infrastructure and information, and therefore the United
States and its allies must take action.” "Strict measures will be taken to
confront these efforts."
Today, the game is not about proxies as it was before, and
the issue has gone beyond the entry of Iran and its Hezbollah forces into the
war. However, if the war on Gaza intensifies by invading it by land, then the
confrontation path between China and the United States of America will turn
into an actual hot war, the spark of which was launched from the smallest gap
in the Mediterranean to Taiwan and will not... The world is reaping
catastrophic consequences.
This war is inevitably coming, but the question is who will
start the war, as it is known strategically that whoever starts a war cannot
end it. This is how we learned from history.
But the management of the global system is no longer
dominated by American decision alone... there are new players.
Comments